From: "Zebediah Figura (she/her)" Subject: Re: [PATCH vkd3d 5/5] tests: Test a number of simple HLSL operations. Message-Id: <90a30852-b44f-50b0-3a80-6bdfae61e798@codeweavers.com> Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2021 12:21:11 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20210831144023.66911-5-gmascellani@codeweavers.com> References: <20210831144023.66911-1-gmascellani@codeweavers.com> <20210831144023.66911-5-gmascellani@codeweavers.com> On 8/31/21 9:40 AM, Giovanni Mascellani wrote: > diff --git a/tests/hlsl-operations.shader_test b/tests/hlsl-operations.shader_test > new file mode 100644 > index 00000000..3c8036b5 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/tests/hlsl-operations.shader_test > @@ -0,0 +1,86 @@ > +[pixel shader] > +float4 main(uniform float zero, uniform float one, uniform float x, uniform float y, > + float4 pos : SV_POSITION) : SV_TARGET > +{ > + int izero = zero; > + int ione = one; > + int ix = x; > + int iy = y; > + uint uzero = zero; > + uint uone = one; > + uint ux = x; > + uint uy = y; > + > + if (pos.x == 0.5) > + return float4(x + y, x - y, x * y, x / y); > + if (pos.x == 1.5) > + return float4(ix + iy, ix - iy, ix * iy, ix / iy); > + if (pos.x == 2.5) > + return float4(ux + uy, ux - uy, ux * uy, ux / uy); > + if (pos.x == 3.5) > + return float4(x % y, +x, -x, y / x); > + if (pos.x == 4.5) > + return float4(ix % iy, +ix, -ix, iy / ix); > + if (pos.x == 5.5) > + return float4(ux % uy, +ux, -ux, uy / ux); > + if (pos.x == 6.5) > + return float4(x == y, x != y, x < y, x <= y); > + if (pos.x == 7.5) > + return float4(x > y, x >= y, !x, !zero); > + if (pos.x == 8.5) > + return float4(ix == iy, ix != iy, ix < iy, ix <= iy); > + if (pos.x == 9.5) > + return float4(ix > iy, ix >= iy, !ix, !izero); > + if (pos.x == 10.5) > + return float4(ix & iy, ix | iy, ix ^ iy, ~ix); > + if (pos.x == 11.5) > + return float4(ix >> 2, ix << 2, iy >> 2, iy << 2); > + if (pos.x == 12.5) > + return float4(ux == uy, ux != uy, ux < uy, ux <= uy); > + if (pos.x == 13.5) > + return float4(ux > uy, ux >= uy, !ux, !uzero); > + if (pos.x == 14.5) > + return float4(ux & uy, ux | uy, ux ^ uy, ~ux); > + if (pos.x == 15.5) > + return float4(ux >> 2, ux << 2, uy >> 2, uy << 2); > + if (pos.x == 16.5) > + return float4(zero && zero, zero && one, one && zero, one && one); > + if (pos.x == 17.5) > + return float4(zero || zero, zero || one, one || zero, one || one); > + if (pos.x == 18.5) > + return float4(izero && izero, izero && ione, ione && izero, ione && ione); > + if (pos.x == 19.5) > + return float4(izero || izero, izero || ione, ione || izero, ione || ione); > + if (pos.x == 20.5) > + return float4(uzero && uzero, uzero && uone, uone && uzero, uone && uone); > + if (pos.x == 21.5) > + return float4(uzero || uzero, uzero || uone, uone || uzero, uone || uone); > + > + return float4(0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0); > +} > + > +[test] > +uniform 0 float4 0.0 1.0 5.0 15.0 > +draw quad > +probe rgba (0, 0) (20.0, -10.0, 75.0, 0.33333333) 1 > +probe rgba (1, 0) (20.0, -10.0, 75.0, 0.0) > +probe rgba (2, 0) (20.0, 4294967300.0, 75.0, 0.0) > +probe rgba (3, 0) (5.0, 5.0, -5.0, 3.0) 1 > +probe rgba (4, 0) (5.0, 5.0, -5.0, 3.0) > +probe rgba (5, 0) (5.0, 5.0, 4294967300.0, 3.0) > +probe rgba (6, 0) (0.0, 1.0, 1.0, 1.0) > +probe rgba (7, 0) (0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 1.0) > +probe rgba (8, 0) (0.0, 1.0, 1.0, 1.0) > +probe rgba (9, 0) (0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 1.0) > +probe rgba (10, 0) (5.0, 15.0, 10.0, -6.0) > +probe rgba (11, 0) (1.0, 20.0, 3.0, 60.0) > +probe rgba (12, 0) (0.0, 1.0, 1.0, 1.0) > +probe rgba (13, 0) (0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 1.0) > +probe rgba (14, 0) (5.0, 15.0, 10.0, 4294967300.0) > +probe rgba (15, 0) (1.0, 20.0, 3.0, 60.0) > +probe rgba (16, 0) (0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 1.0) > +probe rgba (17, 0) (0.0, 1.0, 1.0, 1.0) > +probe rgba (18, 0) (0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 1.0) > +probe rgba (19, 0) (0.0, 1.0, 1.0, 1.0) > +probe rgba (20, 0) (0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 1.0) > +probe rgba (21, 0) (0.0, 1.0, 1.0, 1.0) > Some of these operations work with SM2-3, but not all of them. We don't currently have tests for anything other than 4.0, but ideally we'd like to compile all tests on all targets possible. Not to mention that this is kind of a lot, and I'm not convinced that we won't want more tests for any given operation. If nothing else it'd be nice to split these into arithmetic, shift, logical, and bitwise tests.