From: Alexandre Julliard Subject: Re: [PATCH] ntdll: Add SIGQUIT to server block set. Message-Id: <87bli8tsuz.fsf@wine> Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2020 15:01:24 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20200910234104.1216168-1-pgofman@codeweavers.com> (Paul Gofman's message of "Fri, 11 Sep 2020 02:41:04 +0300") References: <20200910234104.1216168-1-pgofman@codeweavers.com> Paul Gofman writes: > Receiving SIGQUIT for forced thread termination may leave sync > objects (like virtual_mutex) locked. I suspect that this will only create a different class of deadlocks, with threads that can't be killed. Avoiding locks at process exit is probably safer. -- Alexandre Julliard julliard@winehq.org