From: Micah N Gorrell <mgorrell@codeweavers.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH resend 4/8] sechost: Implement I_ScRegisterDeviceNotification()
Message-Id: <20191017181928.GH87643@dent>
Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2019 12:19:28 -0600
In-Reply-To: <b7eeaabc-41c5-e8d0-2d35-f19978fd019f@codeweavers.com>
References: <20191017145317.1998353-1-mgorrell@codeweavers.com> <20191017145317.1998353-4-mgorrell@codeweavers.com> <b7eeaabc-41c5-e8d0-2d35-f19978fd019f@codeweavers.com>

On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 08:53:05PM +0300, Nikolay Sivov wrote:
> I don't remember if this was already discussed for this particular patchset,
> RPC interface svcctl was updated at some point to better match published MS
> prototypes, see [1]. If your new methods are custom comparing to current
> docs, I think it's better to register separate interface than making it
> differ more than it already does.

What do you mean by "register separate interface"? I think, but am not sure,
that MS does have matching methods. My initial goal was to match them as closely
as possible but I wasn't able to determine what the MS version actually looks
like.

Cheers,
Micah