From: Marvin Subject: Re: [PATCH] ntdll: Improve invalid paramater handling in NtAccessCheck. Message-Id: Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2019 09:29:32 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20190423133150.868-1-infyquest@gmail.com> References: <20190423133150.868-1-infyquest@gmail.com> Hi, While running your changed tests, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at: https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=51386 Your paranoid android. === debian9 (32 bit report) === advapi32: security.c:1457: Test failed: AccessCheck should have failed with ERROR_INSUFFICIENT_BUFFER, instead of 998 security.c:1459: Test failed: PrivSetLen returns 0 === debian9 (32 bit French report) === advapi32: security.c:1457: Test failed: AccessCheck should have failed with ERROR_INSUFFICIENT_BUFFER, instead of 998 security.c:1459: Test failed: PrivSetLen returns 0 === debian9 (32 bit Japanese:Japan report) === advapi32: security.c:1457: Test failed: AccessCheck should have failed with ERROR_INSUFFICIENT_BUFFER, instead of 998 security.c:1459: Test failed: PrivSetLen returns 0 === debian9 (32 bit Chinese:China report) === advapi32: security.c:1457: Test failed: AccessCheck should have failed with ERROR_INSUFFICIENT_BUFFER, instead of 998 security.c:1459: Test failed: PrivSetLen returns 0 === debian9 (32 bit WoW report) === advapi32: security.c:1457: Test failed: AccessCheck should have failed with ERROR_INSUFFICIENT_BUFFER, instead of 998 security.c:1459: Test failed: PrivSetLen returns 0 === debian9 (64 bit WoW report) === advapi32: security.c:1457: Test failed: AccessCheck should have failed with ERROR_INSUFFICIENT_BUFFER, instead of 998 security.c:1459: Test failed: PrivSetLen returns 0