From: Vijay Kiran Kamuju Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] server: Add default security descriptor ownership for processes. Message-Id: Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2019 19:50:38 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87r29uos9g.fsf@wine> References: <20190417085332.1918-1-infyquest@gmail.com> <874l6qq7zf.fsf@wine> <87r29uos9g.fsf@wine> On Mon, Apr 22, 2019 at 7:37 PM Alexandre Julliard wrote: > > "Erich E. Hoover" writes: > > > On Mon, Apr 22, 2019 at 11:13 AM Alexandre Julliard wrote: > >> > >> Vijay Kiran Kamuju writes: > >> > >> > +static struct security_descriptor *process_get_sd( struct object *obj ) > >> > +{ > >> > + static struct security_descriptor *key_default_sd; > >> > + > >> > + if (obj->sd) return obj->sd; > >> > + > >> > + if (!key_default_sd) > >> > + { > >> > + size_t users_sid_len = security_sid_len( security_domain_users_sid ); > >> > + size_t admins_sid_len = security_sid_len( security_builtin_admins_sid ); > >> > + > >> > + key_default_sd = mem_alloc( sizeof(*key_default_sd) + admins_sid_len + users_sid_len ); > >> > + key_default_sd->control = SE_DACL_PRESENT; > >> > + key_default_sd->owner_len = admins_sid_len; > >> > + key_default_sd->group_len = users_sid_len; > >> > + key_default_sd->sacl_len = 0; > >> > + key_default_sd->dacl_len = 0; > >> > + memcpy( key_default_sd + 1, security_builtin_admins_sid, admins_sid_len ); > >> > + memcpy( (char *)(key_default_sd + 1) + admins_sid_len, security_domain_users_sid, users_sid_len ); > >> > + } > >> > + return key_default_sd; > >> > >> key_default_sd is clearly not the appropriate name here. > > > > Sorry about that, I clearly started with the registry example > > (key_get_sd). Would you prefer process_default_sd or just default_sd? > > Either is fine. +1 for process_default_sd > > -- > Alexandre Julliard > julliard@winehq.org